Get extra lift from AOPA. Start your free membership trial today! Click here

NTSB says warbird airshow collision reflects poor planning

The NTSB attributed the midair collision of a Bell P–63F King Cobra fighter with a B–17G bomber during the Commemorative Air Force’s Wings Over Dallas airshow on November 12, 2022, to factors ranging from “inadequate prebriefing” to a lack of oversight by the FAA and airshow industry officials. The investigative agency released the findings December 9, ahead of the final report scheduled to be published December 12.


This graphic depicts the descending final turns of various aircraft leading up to the collision. NTSB image.

The collision occurred as a group of eight vintage military aircraft including fighters and bombers flew parade laps in front of spectators. The group of aircraft had completed a pass from right to left and was setting up for another pass in the opposite direction. Just prior to the accident, the ground-based air boss who was directing the aircraft by radio called for the fighter pilots to fly ahead of the B–17G and cross in front of it, moving from the bomber’s left side to its right.

The first two fighters in trail formation completed the repositioning maneuver. As the P–63F, which followed the first two fighters, performed a descending left banked turn toward the show line, it struck the left side of the B-17G near the trailing edge of the left wing, the NTSB said in its report. Both aircraft broke apart and fell to the ground. The crash killed all five people aboard the B–17G and the single pilot of the P–63F. No one on the ground, nor anyone aboard the other performing aircraft, was injured.

After conducting a simulation study of the crash, the NTSB “determined that the accident pilots had limited ability to see and avoid each other’s airplane due to flight path geometry and out-the-window view obscuration by aircraft structures.”

According to the NTSB, some pilots of other aircraft performing in the show told the agency during interviews that they were “confused by the air boss’s long stream of instructions.”  The NTSB also said the airshow industry lacks standardized terms when communicating with pilots and called the air boss’s deconfliction strategy “ineffective.”

The NTSB also said the FAA and the International Council of Air Shows “had not adequately considered the need to better mitigate the collision risks associated with performances involving multiple dissimilar aircraft.”

Investigators determined the probable cause of the accident was the airshow’s lack of a prebriefed aircraft separation plan and its reliance instead on the air boss’s “real-time deconfliction directives and the see-end-avoid strategy for collision avoidance, which allowed for the loss of separation between the Boeing B-17G and the Bell P-63F airplanes.”

Among the NTSB’s recommendations to the FAA, the ICAS, and the CAF were the establishment of standard operating procedures for airshow organizers and air bosses, performing risk assessments for each performance, and requiring recurrent air boss evaluations.


Jonathan Welsh
Jonathan Welsh
Digital Media Content Producer
Jonathan Welsh is a private pilot, career journalist and lifelong aviation enthusiast who previously worked as a writer and editor with Flying Magazine and the Wall Street Journal.
Topics: Airshow, Accident

Related Articles