AOPA will be closed on February 18 in observance of Presidents Day. We will reopen at 8:30 a.m. EST on February 19.
Already a member? Please login below for an enhanced experience. Not a member? Join today

FAA delays AD on PA-28 fuel selector cover placardsFAA delays AD on PA-28 fuel selector cover placards

At AOPA’s request the FAA has delayed from Feb. 7 until March 9 the effective date for an airworthiness directive (AD) that would have required inspections of 17,957 Piper PA–28 series single-engine aircraft to verify that the left and right fuel tank selector cover placards are positioned properly, and replacement of those found not to conform.

An airworthiness directive pertaining to Piper PA-28 models requires inspection of the fuel tank selector to verify proper placard placement. AOPA file photo.

The agency granted AOPA’s request for a global alternative method of compliance that provides aircraft owners an additional 30 days’ relief to perform the mandated inspections, said AOPA Senior Director of Regulatory Affairs David Oord.

AOPA is hopeful the 30-day interval will also give the FAA time to consider comments submitted on the AD due by a March 9 deadline. Although the AD solicited comments, it was originally to take effect Feb. 7 without the customary public-notice period, which the FAA described as “impractical,” citing a “risk to the flying public.”

Urging that a new AD be issued after the public is heard and comments considered, AOPA submitted formal comments to the docket, acknowledging the safety risk of improper fuel selection and management but noting that the association was “unaware of any accidents or incidents that have occurred as a result of improper placards. Many of the affected fleet have been in operation for decades and the owner/operator has likely verified the accuracy of the fuel selector and corresponding tank through fuel gauge readings over hundreds, if not thousands of hours.”

With no placard-related accidents known and only one report of fuel placards reversed, AOPA questioned the urgency of the FAA proceeding to the AD final rule without issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking that afforded the public the requested opportunity to comment before action is taken.

AOPA also contended that PA–28 owners and operators “are capable and should be allowed to perform the initial inspection,” adding that the FAA “has a long history of allowing such actions.”

The FAA estimated the cost of compliance with the original AD at $42.50 for each inspection, resulting in a total estimated cost of more than $763,000 for the fleet of 17,957 airplanes—money that could be saved if aircraft owners were permitted to perform the initial inspection.

Dan Namowitz

Dan Namowitz

Associate Editor Web
Associate Editor Web Dan Namowitz has been writing for AOPA in a variety of capacities since 1991. He has been a flight instructor since 1990 and is a 30-year AOPA member.
Topics: Advocacy, Aircraft Regulation, Airworthiness Directives

Related Articles